FeedTacoma.com - Local blogs, talk, events, photos, videos, Tacomic, and more!

2006
2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 x
« Possible delay in Winthrop financing vote Home Delay in Winthrop financing vote »

Latest Entries

Life (take 2)

Photos ~ Commencement Bay in a Summer Storm-Given Shroud

Photos ~ Pack Forest Hike and Alder Lake

Photos ~ Frost Park Chalk Off #20

Photos ~ An Evening Sunset Ride

Photos ~ Red Hot Birthday

View all entries »

Tue. September 12, 2006, 01:43pm PDT

Bates video takedown and back story

Just got a call from someone at Bates requesting I take a video I recently linked to down because it's copyrighted material (and they "wouldn't want anyone getting in trouble for that"). Apparently, sounds like it was indeed an indie film shoot with all the proper permits shooting a robbery scene that actually had a real security guard or two on-site since weapons were present. They had been filming the same scene for an hour or so (making it highly unlikely to be a real robbery since they were there for so long) and someone still called the police. The gentleman even said they had signs around saying it was a film shoot.

I think the big brew haha comes since it was obviously a pretty embarassing incident for Bates (not the mention the TPD who neglected to cross-check the call against the filed permits) plus it happened back in 2002 yet folks got the impression this happened last Saturday when I posted the entry. I'm more than happy to take it down and wanted the gentleman who called to know the video is hosted on Google Video not YouTube like I thought.

I guess I couldn't ask for a more cordial request considering this is my first "cease and desist". Cheers!

 

Comments (2) | To Top


9/12/2006 @ 3:23pm

If it is hosted on google video, what do they care that you have a link to it? They should sue google. Also, fight the power.

by RR Anderson


9/12/2006 @ 3:29pm

I agree after I thought about it a bit. Nevertheless, whether I take it down or Google does it'll end up off my site anyway.

I see it as akin to streaming audio: if a streaming audio station is pushing out copyrighted music and I'm listening to it, am I liable or is the station? I'm not storing anything locally or saving it at all since the content is hosted/served up from somewhere completely different.

I'm also not in the business of making fools of anyone (usually) and don't want Bates to have to deal with this old issue again.

Great video though, nonetheless. Good thing they can make me take the memory of it out of my head!

by KevinFreitas

Post Comments


(No HTML, comments with http://... will be reviewed)

What is 5 + 6 ?

Remember me? Yes   No

Please do not fill in the following field:

www.kevinfreitas.net   urges you to   Get Firefox